References

  1. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva[Aesthetics of Verbal Creation].Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1986. 444 p. (In Russ.)

  2. Gachev G. D. Natsional’nye obrazy mira. Tsentral’naya Aziya: Kazakhstan. Kirgiziya. Kosmos Islama (intellektual’nye puteshestviya) [National Images of the World. Central Asia: Kazakhstan. Kyrgyzstan. The Cosmos of Islam (Intellectual Journeys)].Moscow, Izdatel’skiy servis Publ., 2002. 784 p. (In Russ.)

  3. Esaulov I. A. Russkaya klassika: novoe ponimanie [Russian Classics: New Understanding]. St. Petersburg, Aleteyya Publ., 2012. 448 p. (In Russ.)

  4. Esaulov I. A. The Categories of Law and Grace in Lermontov’s Poetics.In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 2014, issue 12, pp. 7‒17. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1429705393.pdf (accessed on October 10, 2024). EDN: TKQMDT (In Russ.)

  5. Esaulov I. A. The Ode “God” («Богъ») by G. R. Derzhavin: the New Understanding.In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 2016, issue 14, pp. 45‒67. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1482920409.pdf (accessed on October 10, 2024). EDN: XQZXIJ (In Russ.)

  6. Zakirova I. G. Representation of the Soul’s Motif in the Turkic Epic Tradition. In: Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chuvash University], 2011, no. 1, pp. 275‒279. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/reprezentatsiya-motiva-dushi-v-tyurkskoy-epicheskoy-traditsii/viewer (accessed on October 10, 2024). EDN: NOSXGF (In Russ.)

  7. Zakharov V. N. The Idea of Ethnopoetics in Contemporary Research. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 2020, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 7‒19. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1593805089.pdf (accessed on October 10, 2024). DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2020.8382. EDN: IFROFH (In Russ.)

  8. Zyryanov O. V. Problems and Methods of Modern Ethnopoetics. In: Filologicheskiy klass [Philological Class], 2019, no. 1 (55), pp. 8–15. Available at: https://filclass.ru/images/JOURNAL/1.pdf (accessed on October 10, 2024). DOI: 10.26170/FK19-01-01. EDN: IBHTPN (In Russ.)

  9. Izer V. Receptive Aesthetics. The Problem of Translatability: Hermeneutics and Modern Humanitarian Knowledge. In: Akademicheskie tetradi: al’manakh [Academic Notebooks: Almanac], 1999, issue 6, pp. 59–96. (In Russ.)

  10. Kosyakov G. V. The Motif of a Soul’s Flight in the Poems by M. Yu. Lermontov. In: Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Russian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities], 2020, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 6–12. Available at: https://journal.omga.su/wp-content/files/14.2/1.pdf (accessed on October 10, 2024). DOI: 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2020.14.2.1. EDN: FLWLYI(In Russ.)

  11. Levakin N. N. Art Reception as a Literary Concept (on Understanding the Term). In: Izvestiya Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni V. G. Belinskogo. Humanities, 2012, no. 27, pp. 308–310. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/hudozhestvennaya-retseptsiya-kak-literaturovedcheskoe-ponyatie-k-voprosu-ponimaniya-termina/viewer (accessed on October 10, 2024). EDN: PKBCCT (In Russ.)

  12. Maslova A. G. The Problem of Time in Late 18th Century Russian Poetry About Trasience and Vanity of Life. In: Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta imeni N. I. Lobachevskogo [Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod], 2011, no. 2 (1), pp. 333‒339. Available at: http://www.unn.ru/pages/e-library/vestnik/99999999_West_2011_2/50.pdf (accessed on October 10, 2024). EDN: NXSVFT (In Russ.)

  13. Haris R. M. The Great Poetic explanation of the Great Mysteries / (G. R. Derzhavin’s Ode “God”). In: Renat Haris. Time and Pen: Literature, Art, Journalism: Articles, Memoirs, Interviews. Kazan, Tatar Book Publishing House Publ., 2016, pp. 30‒33. (In tatar.)

  14. Kharitonova A. V. Reception of the Hagiographic Tradition in A. Varlamov’s Story “The Little Star”. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 2022, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 252–271. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1669638431.pdf (accessed on October 10, 2024). DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2022.11602. EDN: WJTQCC (In Russ.)

  15. Sharyafetdinov R. Kh. The Mythological Image of a Bird as a Reflection of the Culture of the Tatar People in Modern Literature. In: Nauka i shkola [Science and School], 2021, no. 5, pp. 11–19. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mifologicheskiy-obraz-ptitsy-kak-otrazhenie-kultury-tatarskogo-naroda-v-sovremennoy-literature/viewer (accessed on October 10, 2024). DOI: 10.31862/1819-463X-2021-5-11-19. EDN: UUNJLH (In Russ.) (a)

  16. Sharyafetdinov R. Kh. Semantics of Religious and Mythological Motif of Prayer/Supplication in Modern Tatar Literature. In: Vestnik Chuvashskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni I. Ya. Yakovleva [I. Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University Bulletin],2021, no. 4 (113), pp. 99–107. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/semantika-religiozno-mifologicheskogo-motiva-molitvy-molby-v-sovremennoy-tatarskoy-literature/viewer (accessed on October 10, 2024). DOI: 10.37972/chgpu.2021.113.4.012. EDN: BAVRWV (In Russ.) (b)

  17. Shener L. Reception of F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel in Turkish Literature of the 20th — 21st Centuries. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 2021, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 331–343. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1638431275.pdf (accessed on October 10, 2024). DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2021.10102. EDN: AHAABO (In Russ.)

  18. Yauss G. The History of Literature as a Provocation of Literary Criticism. In: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 1995, no. 12, pp. 34‒84. (In Russ.)


Продолжая использовать данный сайт, Вы даете согласие на обработку файлов Cookies и других пользовательских данных, в соответствии с Политикой конфиденциальности.