References

  1. Arutyunova N. D. Axiology in the Mechanisms of Life and Language. In: Arutyunova N. D. Problemy strukturnoy lingvistiki [Arutyunova N. D. Problems of Structural Linguistics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, pp. 5—23. (In Russ.)

  2. Arutyunova N. D. Metaphor and Discourse. In: Teoriya metafory [Theory of Metaphor]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, pp. 5—32. (In Russ.)

  3. Barkova M. V. Epistolyarnyy zhanr. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [Epistolary Genre. History and Modernity]. Arzamas, Arzamas State Pedagogical Institute Publ., 2006. 104 p. (In Russ.)

  4. Baturova T. K. Petersburg Almanacs of Pushkin’s Time in the Spiritual Aspect. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya «Russkaya filologiya» [The Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series “Russian Philology”], 2012, no. 3, pp. 96—101. (In Russ.)

  5. Batyuto A. I. Dostoevsky and Turgenev in 60—70s: Is There Only a Story of Enmity. In: Russkaya literatura, 1979, no. 1, pp. 41—64. (In Russ.)

  6. Budanova N. F. Dostoevskiy i Turgenev: tvorcheskiy dialog [Dostoevsky and Turgenev: Creative Dialogue]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1987. 200 p. (In Russ.)

  7. Byalyy G. A. Two Schools of Psychological Realism (Turgenev and Dostoevsky). In: Byalyy G. A. Russkiy realizm kontsa XIX v. [Byaly G. A. Russian Realism of the Late of the 19th Century]. Leningrad, Leningrad State University Publ., 1973, pp. 31—53. (In Russ.)

  8. Vinogradov V. V. Turgenev and the School of Young Dostoevsky: The End of the 40s of the 19th Century. In: Russkaya literatura, 1959, no. 2, pp. 45—72. (In Russ.)

  9. Volkov V. V., Volkova N. V. “Mass Literature” as a Book Science and Linguocultural Concept. In: Yazyk i kul’tura [Language and Culture]. Novosibirsk, 2015, no. 16, pp. 105—111. (In Russ.)

  10. Gut’yar N. I. S. Turgenev and F. M. Dostoevsky. In: Russkaya starina [The Russian Antiquity], 1902, vol. 109, pp. 307—336. (In Russ.)

  11. Dolinin A. S. Turgenev in “Demons”. In: F. M. Dostoevskiy: stat’i i materialy [F. M. Dostoevsky: Articles and Materials]. Leningrad, Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1924, collection 2, pp. 117—136. (In Russ.)

  12. Dostoevskiy F. M., Turgenev I. S. Perepiska [Correspondence]. Leningrad, Academia Publ., 1928. 200 p. (In Russ.)

  13. Dostoevskiy F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 30 tomakh [The Complete Works: in 30 Vols]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1978, vol. 18. 371 p. (In Russ.)

  14. Zakharov V. N. Do We Have Literature? Concepts “Literature” and “Slovesnost’” in Russian Criticism. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 2016, vol. 14, pp. 7—15. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1482396216.pdf (accessed on November 24, 2019). DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2016.4043 (In Russ.)

  15. Zakharov V. N. The Lessons of Dostoevsky in “The Hunting Sketches” by Turgenev. In: I. S. Turgenev: tekst i kontekst [I. S. Turgenev: Text and Context]. St. Petersburg, Skriptorium Publ., 2018, pp. 244—252. (In Russ.)

  16. Karaulov Yu. N. Russkiy assotsiativnyy slovar’: v 2 tomakh [TheRussian Associative Dictionary: in 2 Vols]. Moscow, AST-Astrel’ Publ., 2002. Available at: http://tesaurus.ru/dict/ (accessed on November 24, 2019). (In Russ.)

  17. Kibal’nik S. A. “Notes from the Dead House” by Dostoevsky vs. “The Hunting Sketches” by Turgenev. In: Spasskiy vestnik, 2012, no. 20, pp. 13—22. (In Russ.)

  18. Kovaleva N. A. Russkoe chastnoe pis’mo XIX veka. Kommunikatsiya. Zhanr. Rechevaya struktura [Russian Private Letter of the 19th Century. Communication. Genre. Speech Structure]. Moscow, SportAkademPress Publ., 2001. 284 p. (In Russ.)

  19. Kur’yanovich A. V. Epistolary Discourse as a Form of Existence of the Russian Elite Speech Culture (on the Example of Letters of V. I. Vernadsky). In: Russkaya rechevaya kul’tura i tekst: materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (25—27 marta 2010 g.) [Russian Speech Culture and Text: Materials of the 6th International Scientific Conference (March 25—27, 2010)]. Tomsk, Tomsk Center for Scientific and Technical Information Publ., 2010, pp. 53—59. (In Russ.)

  20. Larionova Yu. A. Frazeologicheskiy slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [The Phraseological Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language]. Moscow, Adelant Publ., 2014. 512 p. (In Russ.)

  21. Leshutina I. A. Konstanty i peremennye russkoy «pochtovoy prozy» pervoy treti XIX stoletiya: dis. ... d-ra  filol. nauk [The Constants and the Variables of the Russian “Postal Prose” of the First Third of the 19th Century. PhD. philol. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2006. 435 p. (In Russ.)

  22. Likhachev D. S. The Conceptosphere of the Russian Language. In: Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Language and Literature], 1993, vol. 52, issue 1, pp. 3—9. (In Russ.)

  23. Lotman L. M. Turgenev, Dostoevsky and Literary Polemic in 1845. In: I. S. Turgenev. Voprosy biografii i tvorchestva [I. S. Turgenev. Issues of Biographies and Work]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1982, pp. 20—44. (In Russ.)

  24. Mostovskaya N. N. Dostoevsky in the Perception of I. S. Turgenev and P. V. Annenkov. In: Spasskiy vestnik, 2002, no. 9, pp. 47—56. (In Russ.)

  25. Nikol’skiy Yu. A. Turgenev i Dostoevskiy: istoriya odnoy vrazhdy [Turgenev and Dostoevsky: The Story of One Antagonism]. Sofiya, Rossiysko-bolgarskoe knigoizdatel’stvo Publ., 1921. 108 p. (In Russ.)

  26. Novyy slovar’ inostrannykh slov (NSIS) [The New Dictionary of Foreign Words]. Moscow, Azbukovnik Publ., 2008. 1040 p. (In Russ.)

  27. Rebel’ G. M. Geroi i zhanrovye formy romanov Turgeneva i Dostoevskogo. Tipologicheskie yavleniya russkoy literatury XIX veka [Heroes and Genre Forms of the Novels of Turgenev and Dostoevsky. Typological Phenomena of Russian Literature of the 19th Century]. Perm, Perm State Pedagogical University Publ., 2007. 398 p. (In Russ.)

  28. Sternin I. A. Types of Meanings and Concept. In: Kontseptual’noe prostranstvo yazyka: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Posvyashchaetsya yubileyu professora Nikolaya Nikolaevicha Boldyreva [Conceptual Space of Language: The Collection of Scientific Papers. Dedicated to the Anniversary of Professor Nikolai Nikolaevich Boldyrev]. Tambov, Derzhavin Tambov State University Publ., 2005, pp. 257—282. (In Russ.)

  29. Teliya V. N. Metaphorization and its Role in Creating of Linguistic Picture of the World. In: Rol’ chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke: yazyk i kartina mira [Role of the Human Factor in Language: Language and Picture of the World]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988, pp. 173—204. (In Russ.)

  30. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka: v 4 tomakh [TheExplanatoryDictionary of the Russian Language: in 4 Vols]. Moscow, State Institute Soviet Encyclopedia Publ., OGIZ Publ., State Publishing House of Foreign and National dictionaries Publ., 1935—1940. Available at: https://ushakovdictionary.ru/ (accessed on October 15, 2019). (In Russ.)

  31. Fedorenko B. V. From the Search for Dostoevsky. Once Again About Dostoevsky and Turgenev: From the History of Their Relationship. In: Novye aspekty v izuchenii Dostoevskogo [New Aspects in Studying of Dostoevsky]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 1994, pp. 242—294. (In Russ.)

  32. Yaduvankina A. A. The Concept of “Russian Literature” in the English Press Through the Image of a Russian Author. In: Voprosy obshchego yazykoznaniya i teorii teksta [Issues of General Linguistics and Text Theory]. Cheboksary, Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University Publ., 2018, pp. 126—129. (In Russ.)

  33. Yaodeng M. On the Acknowledgment of the Concept “Soviet Literature” in China After 1991. In: Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni M. K. Ammosova [Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University], 2019, no. 6 (74), pp. 136–145. (In Russ.)

  34. Hoffman R. Some Implications of Metaphor for Philosophy and Psychology of Science. In: The Ubiquity of Metaphor: Metaphor in Language and Thought. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publ., 1985, pp. 327—381. (In English)